Encyclical Hysteria


I have only scanned part of the encyclical and read excerpts of other parts thus far. It will be challenging, for sure. But it is part of the Papal Magisterium, so we must read it with an open and humble heart and follow its teaching.

That said, it also has to be interpreted correctly. There are already those who are interpreting it in the most hysterical of ways. Therefore, a warning:

1. Don’t listen to secular media reports about the encyclical. Whether it’s Fox, CNN, MSNBC, or your local news, DON’T LISTEN. The majority of journalists reporting on this are taking a political and worldly approach to interpreting this document. Some are trying to sow division in the Church and others simply don’t “get it”. If you want to hear news analysis about it, I highly recommend EWTN News Nightly instead.
2. READ THE ENCYCLICAL YOURSELF. It is part of the Papal Magisterium and therefore is important for us, as Catholics. If there are parts that you find particularly difficult or challenging, speak to a priest and ask him to help clarify things.

Finally, I think it’s important to remember that the encyclical takes its name from a canticle written by St. Francis of Assisi. And that canticle ends with a very strong spiritual emphasis, which must inform our own approach to living – whether we are thinking about the environment or about liturgy or whatever. As Fr. Z wrote on his blog recently:

[L]et’s not that Francis’ hymn ends with the real point of everything we do: salvation!

Be praised, my Lord, through our sister Bodily Death,
from whose embrace no living person can escape.
Woe to those who die in mortal sin!
Happy those she finds doing Your most holy will.
The second death can do no harm to them.

Read the encyclical yourself and don’t trust secular reports!

This entry was posted in Ad Hoc and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Encyclical Hysteria

  1. Amen! I just finished reading it myself a short while ago. I was curious after hearing so much buzz about it what would actually be said in it and I truly enjoyed it. God Bless!

  2. Laudato Si’ is a continuation of the social teaching of the Church. The traditional terms of solidarity and subsidiarity are used. It calls for both international dialogue and for individuals to think globally and act locally.
    I was bemused by the “ifs” in Part One regarding the science.
    Unlike past papal statements that questioned the predominant economic systems of both communism and capitalism, this one focused on capitalism (perhaps because the major communist nations are now deep into post-communist capitalism).
    Capitalism is the last man standing but it is a capitalism that needs to be corrected according to Francis.
    The call for industry to be more focused on the person begs the question has it ever in the past?
    I think not, ergo the union system. Unfortunately, the union system itself has become an “industry” which also does little for the individual worker.
    I am certain that much ink will be spent for a few days or weeks but its impact will unfortunatley fall to the wayside quickly. Already it is out of the news stream, replaced by the SCOTUS decision of yesterday.

    • Thank you for the summary and your thoughts! I agree; our national attention span is about 30 seconds, and most have moved on to gay marriage. We’ll see what bread and circuses next week brings…

Comments are closed.